Question: I am a second year law student, so I have now spent two years studying in the faculty. I would like to know whether I should leave, because it does not resort to the Sharee`ah (Islaamic law) for rulings, but to positive law? Is it permissible to work as a prosecutor investigating cases on the basis of man-made laws? Is working as a professor in the faculty Haraam (prohibited)? Is practicing law for a living Haraam?
Answer: Firstly, Studying positive law is permissible for someone who is endowed with sufficient intellectual and academic ability to distinguish between truth and falsehood, and they are not vulnerable, due to their strong Islaamic faith, to become deviated from the truth and deceived by falsehood… read more here.
Question: We are preoccupied with some issues, including studying law at the Faculty of Law. The Muslims strongly disagree on this issue. I ask that Allaah (Glorified and Exalted be He) guide you to clarify this issue for us, which includes:
(1) The ruling on studying positive (man-made) laws.
(2) The ruling on working as an attorney or a judge.
Answer: If the person who wants to study man-made laws possesses the intellectual and academic capacity to distinguish truth from falsehood and is guarded by his Islaam against deviation from truth and attraction towards falsehood, and his intention for studying them is to compare the laws of Islaam with man-made laws in order to show the advantages of Islaam and its encompassment of all that people need to correct their worldly and religious affairs, standing as entirely sufficient, and by way of upholding truth and negating falsehood, and to refute the claims of the uprightness, perfection and sufficiency of man-made laws – if this is the case, it is permissible to study them… read more here.
Question: What is the ruling on invoking Allaah against a ruler who does not judge according to Allaah’s revealed Law?
Answer: You should supplicate to Allaah to guide him and grant him success, and bring about through him reformation among his people, so that he rules them by Allaah’s revealed Law… read more here.
Question: Could you please give us the legal ruling regarding some Muslims who take oaths in the name of Allaah to respect man-made laws, even though these laws contradict the Sharee‘ah (Islaamic law)?Is this among the forbidden acts? As the policy of some legislative councils stipulates that a member must take such an oath when they are appointed to an official position. Please, explain the legal ruling on this?
Answer: It is impermissible without taking an oath; how will it be, then, when one takes an oath by Allaah to do so! No doubt, the sin will be greater with an oath taken… read more here.
Question: Is it Haraam (prohibited) for a Muslim and a Christian to cooperate in political and social fields?
Answer: It is permissible for a Muslim to cooperate with a Christian in whatever does not contradict with Islaamic laws… read more here.
Question: Is it permissible for a Muslim to vote in elections? If yes, is it permissible for them to vote for Kuffaar (disbelievers)?
Answer: It is impermissible for Muslims to vote for Kuffaar, as this may lead to exalt their status and boost their power and authority, resulting in them having ascendancy over Muslims. Allaah (Glorified be He) says (what means)… read more here.
Question: Are the Muslims who take part in preparing this constitution sinful?
Answer: If some articles in the constitution contradict Islaam, it is impermissible to take part in preparing it. If not, there is nothing wrong with that… read more here.
Question: It may have come to your knowledge that our government is a secular one that does not pay attention to religion. It governs the country with a constitution prepared by both Muslims and Christians. The question is: Can we call it an Islaamic government or a Kaafir (non-Islamic) one?
Answer: If such a government rules according to something other than what is revealed by Allaah, then it is not an Islaamic government… read more here.
Question: Please explain the ruling on two people who, for example, if they are disputing, resort to the tribal rules, and each of them appoints a “Mi`dal,” as they call him, and they choose one of the tribal chieftains to judge between them. They then sit in front of him and state their complaints against the other. If it is a simple dispute, the guilty party is ordered to slaughter an animal for the other party. If it is a major dispute, the guilty party is ordered to be given “Al-Janbiyyah;” this used to mean that they were beatenon their head with a sharp tool until they bleed, nowadays it involves the guilty party paying an amount of Dirhams as a fine. They call this practice a reconciliation, and it is common among the tribes-people. They also call it Al-Math-hab (the doctrine), and if someone does not accept their judgment, they call them “Qati` Al-Math-hab (a dissenter from the doctrine).” Dear shaykh, what is the legal ruling on this?
Answer: It is obligatory for Muslims to resolve their disputes in courts that apply the Sharee`ah (Islaamic law), not tribal rules or man-made laws. In fact, what you have mentioned is not really reconciliation; it is judging according to tribal principles and rules… read more here.
Question: We live in a country controlled by a non-Muslim government that applies man-made laws. Is it permissible for us to pursue lawsuits in their courts?
Answer: It is not permissible for a Muslim to pursue a lawsuit under a non-Muslim government, as Allaah (Exalted be He) says… read more here.